{"id":5002,"date":"2014-05-14T10:20:27","date_gmt":"2014-05-14T14:20:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/?page_id=5002"},"modified":"2014-05-14T12:11:32","modified_gmt":"2014-05-14T16:11:32","slug":"aspire-nautilus-vs-kanger-aerotank","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/breaking-news\/aspire-nautilus-vs-kanger-aerotank\/","title":{"rendered":"Aspire Nautilus vs Kanger Aerotank"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/a>\"AerotankAfter vaping with an Aspire Nautilus and a Kanger Protank for a few months, it seems most useful to review the two together. \u00a0They have the same general configuration and fill the same niche, but are noticeably different in design and function. \u00a0The Nautilus reviewed below was purchased from\u00a0Viper Vape<\/a>\u00a0and the Kanger Aerotank from My Freedom Smokes<\/a> (although Litecig<\/a> has them for less now).<\/p>\n

Adjustable airflow is the signature design feature of both of these tanks. \u00a0Both are of the bottom dual coil (BDC) design, have replaceable atomizer heads and Pyrex glass tanks sandwiched between stainless steel housings. \u00a0That’s where the similarities end.<\/p>\n

The Aerotank Design<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Aerotank seems to take its design cues from a rebuildable atomizer. \u00a0It looks like a thinner version of a Kayfun, only with more glass. \u00a0The relatively thin form factor results in a 3.8ml capacity. \u00a0The base of the tank section incorporates a crossbar design like that of the Anyvape Davide which undoubtedly increases rigidity and provides a means of connecting the top and bottom of the housing, but also restricts filling to a degree. \u00a0Unscrewing the base of the tank from the center post allows both ends to be removed from the glass for cleaning. \u00a0Overall there is a nice heavy feel to the unit and the solid stainless drip tip adds to the effect.\"Kanger<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

The atomizer head is quite similar to the head on Kanger’s earlier single coil Protank series, but with an elongated form to handle dual coils. \u00a0The coils sit one on top of the other with a piece of wick separating the two. \u00a0Short wicks protrude from the coils and into the \u00a0tank in much the same way as the single coils do. \u00a0The chimney that caps off the coil section protrudes into the air tube.<\/p>\n

\"Kanger<\/a><\/p>\n

The big change from the Protank lies in the base of the tank. \u00a0A knurled ring now allows for adjustment of the airflow. \u00a0Turning it clockwise changes the airflow from quite airy to completely closed by restricting the single air hole on the side.<\/p>\n

The Nautilus Design<\/strong><\/p>\n

The design of the Nautilus is completely different, both from the Aerotank and from any tank that came before it. \u00a0It’s a rather wide tank that allows for a 5ml stated capacity. \u00a0The glass section of the tank is capped by metal at each end, but the top of the glass narrows into a threaded section where the top cap screws on, making for an exposed curvature of glass at the top. \u00a0The result is a somewhat more fragile look, but one that gives a clear view of the eliquid within.<\/p>\n

\"Aspire<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Also unique is the way the atomizer head connects to the tube of the tank. \u00a0The head screws into the base, but then also has threads that screw into the center tube, effectively clamping the glass between the top cap and base. \u00a0The top cap does screw onto threads on the glass, but the base is held in place entirely by the center tube connection. \u00a0A substantial gasket on the base leave no doubt as to whether things are airtight or not.<\/p>\n

The Nautilus dual coil atomizer head also uses a stacked coil arrangement, but has a fiber lining around the inside of the tube rather than protruding wicks. \u00a0Eliquid enters the tube through two holes in the tube and is then transferred to the coil via the fiberfill. \u00a0The setup is quite similar to that of a cartomizer tank.\"Aspire<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

The airflow control of the Nautilus is a great design. \u00a0The knurled ring at the base turns to four different selections, ranging from fairly restricted to wide open. \u00a0The settings seem to be spaced just perfectly for a wide range of airflow preferences.<\/p>\n

Head to Head Performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

I must say initially I didn’t even think I wanted to spend the time on a comparison. \u00a0Right out of the box the Nautilus seemed like it was not up to the task. \u00a0After filling and allowing things to soak for awhile I was rewarded with repeated dry, burnt hits. \u00a0Blowing bubbles in the tank between hits was the only way to get anything approaching a good vape at any of the selected airflow settings. \u00a0The Nautilus actually handled this well, with no leaking through the base that could reasonably be expected.<\/p>\n

Finally, I replaced the coil head with the second one supplied in the package and wow, what a difference. \u00a0From the start, the second head was providing a nice warm, flavorful vape, and quite consistently. \u00a0Quality control strikes again, I suppose, but I am at a loss as to why there should be such a remarkable difference between the two heads. \u00a0At any rate, the fight was on.<\/p>\n

The difference in vape quality between the Nautilus and the Aerotank is negligible, although the Nautilus probably comes out slightly ahead in terms of flavor. \u00a0Both provide a great consistent vape at both lower and higher voltages and both allow for just the right amount of airflow to be selected. \u00a0The airflow adjustment on the Aerotank certainly provides more precision, but I found the air hole to be a little difficult to see sometimes, making it hard to tell where things were set. \u00a0It also is a little more prone to accidental adjustment. \u00a0The Nautilus is easier to set thanks to the stops when turning the ring, but the difference between each hole size can also be a little difficult to see. \u00a0Suffice it to say that simply turning the dial until the draw is right is the easiest way to approach both models.<\/p>\n

Neither of these tanks exhibited much of the dreaded gurgling that plagues so many bottom coil clearomizers. \u00a0The Aerotank will sometimes gurgle a little after repeated use, but only rarely. \u00a0Leakage has been non-existent in either of them, either at the battery connection or through the mouthpiece when filling. \u00a0This achievement is nearly as noteworthy as adjustable airflow.\"Kanger<\/a><\/p>\n

Ease of filling is one area where there is a clear winner. \u00a0The wide opening between the tank wall and center tube of the Nautilus make it incredibly easy to fill. \u00a0Not so much with the Aerotank, which has only small slot in the metal tank bottom for filling. \u00a0Filling it takes either a needle tip or just the right angle, dripping juice along the sidewall and into the tank.\"Aspire<\/a><\/p>\n

The advantage on price is also clear. \u00a0The Aerotank is readily available for between $20 and $25 with replacement heads running around $1.80. \u00a0The Nautilus retails for $25 to $35 at most vendors with replacement heads typically around $3 each. \u00a0Both units come as a kit with two heads included. \u00a0In addition, the heads on the Aerotank are relatively easy to rebuild to save on replacement costs, while the Nautilus heads are considerably more difficult. \u00a0If you do decide to rebuild, please<\/em> be sure to test! \u00a0Dual coils in a small space can create a short very easily.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

I hate to admit it, but this isn’t going to be much of a conclusion. \u00a0After an extended use, I find myself using both of these tanks at nearly the same rate. \u00a0I’m using the Aerotank for much of the day mainly because it seems a little sturdier for pocket duty. \u00a0But the Nautilus has become a favorite on my desk in the evening. \u00a0I’m not sure I could pick one, and I guess my best advice is to try both. \u00a0You won’t be disappointed either way.<\/p>\n

\"Aerotank<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After vaping with an Aspire Nautilus and a Kanger Protank for a few months, it seems most useful to review the two together. \u00a0They have the same general configuration and fill the same niche, but are noticeably different in design and function. \u00a0The Nautilus reviewed below was purchased from\u00a0Viper Vape\u00a0and the Kanger Aerotank from My […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":1174,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5002"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5002"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5022,"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5002\/revisions\/5022"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/vapingguides.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}